This content is being shared by Brand Velocity.

Ai Man Screws Off His Head To Represent The Battle Between Ai Vs. Human Content

Imagine a world where machines pen our stories – sounds like sci-fi, right? Well, that future might be closer than we think.

At Marketing Insider Group, we teamed up with and CMO Huddles for a groundbreaking study: ‘Man vs. Machine.’ We wanted to see how AI, like ChatGPT-3.5, measures up against the creativity of human writers.

This study isn’t just a face-off between human and machine; it’s a deep dive into how the landscape of content creation is evolving, pushing the boundaries of technology and human ingenuity.

Our collaboration brought together unique insights that could redefine content strategies in the digital age, blending artificial intelligence with human creativity.

Quick Takeaways

  • AI content lacks the nuances and depth of human-written content, but the hybrid model shows promise. 
  • Google treats AI content like any other, focusing on quality and relevance.
  • Human-authored content outperforms AI and hybrid content in keyword rankings and web traffic.
  • While AI excels in speed and cost-efficiency, human content wins in creativity, quality, and trust.
  • For now, choosing human content is recommended, but Google’s guidelines may evolve.

Why We Undertook This Study

At Marketing Insider Group, we’re constantly exploring new frontiers in content creation. The advent of AI tools like ChatGPT presented a unique opportunity: Could these tools match or even surpass the quality and effectiveness of human-authored content? We undertook this study to answer this critical question.

Our goal was not just to satisfy our curiosity, but to guide marketers in making informed decisions. By comparing human, AI, and hybrid content, we aimed to uncover the true potential and limitations of AI in content creation, making sure our strategies stay at the forefront of innovation.

How Do You Define “AI Generated Content”?

In our ‘Man vs. Machine’ study, we wanted to compare different content creation methods to evaluate their effectiveness. To do this, we first needed to clearly define the types of content we were analyzing. These were categorized into three distinct groups, each with its own unique process and characteristics.

Graphic Shows 3 Types Of Content Analyzed In Marketing Insider Group’s Research Study On Ai Content Vs. Human Content

1. Human Content

As the name suggests, this content was crafted entirely by our human team, with no assistance from AI tools. It represents the traditional approach to content creation, relying solely on human creativity, expertise, and experience.

2. AI-Generated Content

This is content created by ChatGPT-3.5, with minimal human intervention. We provided the AI with specific prompts and topics, and then it took over, crafting the bulk of the content.

Our role was to review the AI’s output for coherence and accuracy, but the essence of the content – its structure, narrative, and key ideas – was the AI’s doing.

3. Hybrid Content

This category involved a blend of AI-generated content and human expertise. Initially, ChatGPT-3.5 created a draft based on our prompts. Then, our team then stepped in, rewriting and refining this draft to elevate its quality to match that of our purely human-authored content.

Can All Content Writing Be Automated?

This question was at the heart of our study. While AI has made significant strides in content creation, our findings suggest that full automation isn’t yet a reality.

AI-generated content, although quick and efficient, often lacked the nuances and depth that human writers bring to the table. Human content still leads in terms of engagement and SEO performance.

However, the hybrid model shows promise, blending AI’s efficiency with human creativity. It seems, at least for now, that while AI can augment the content writing process, it can’t completely replace the human touch in crafting compelling and resonant stories.

Can AI-Generated Content Rank on Google?

Google’s stance on AI-generated content is fairly straightforward. It treats AI content just like any other, focusing primarily on quality and relevance.

Their guidelines emphasize the importance of original, high-quality, and helpful content, regardless of whether it’s written by humans or AI. As per Google’s E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) framework, the focus is on content that answers user queries effectively.

Graphic Outlines Each Component Of Google E-E-A-T

Image Source: Blogging Guide

Experts in the field echo this sentiment. They point out that while AI content can rank well, it must adhere to the same standards as human-created content. This includes being original, useful, and authoritative.

So, to answer the question: Yes, AI-generated content can rank on Google. However, its success depends on how well it aligns with Google’s quality guidelines and satisfies user intent, just like content written by humans.

Findings of the Study

Diving into the heart of our ‘Man vs. Machine’ research, we meticulously analyzed the performance of human, AI-generated, and hybrid content across several key metrics. This analysis aimed to unravel the effectiveness of each content type.

Our study shed light on some compelling dynamics in content creation, challenging conventional norms and setting new benchmarks for what effective content truly entails. Let’s break down these findings starting with their impact on search engine rankings:


Human-authored content showed a remarkable ability to improve keyword rankings, significantly outpacing AI and hybrid content. New keywords were predominantly introduced through human-written posts.

On the other hand, AI-generated content struggled with maintaining consistent rankings, often experiencing a decline.

Ai Vs. Human Content Graph Shows That Human-Authored Content Improved Keyword Rankings While Ai-Generated Content Struggled To Maintain Consistent Rankings

Hybrid content had its moments of success, occasionally surpassing human content, but these instances were inconsistent.

Web Traffic

In terms of attracting web traffic, human-authored content was the clear winner. It significantly outperformed both AI and hybrid models, indicating a stronger resonance with the audience and more effective engagement.

Human Vs. Ai Content Graph Shows That Human Content Drives More Traffic Than Ai

This suggests that while AI can generate content quickly, it may not yet match the human ability to connect with readers on a deeper level.


AI content initially led in visibility, mainly due to one high-performing post. However, this advantage was not sustained over time.

Graph Shows That A Single Ai Post Drove More Visibility

Hybrid content occasionally outshined human-authored content in search visibility, yet this did not consistently translate into increased web traffic.

Findings on How AI Compares to Human Content

So, how does AI really stack up against humans in the content game? We looked at different factors to get the full picture:

  • Authenticity: Human content excelled in originality and authenticity, offering unique perspectives and a personal touch. AI, while efficient, often lacked this depth of personalization.
  • Creativity: Humans outshone AI in creativity, particularly in wordplay, humor, and emotional depth. AI-generated content, governed by algorithms, struggled to replicate this level of creative expression.
  • Cost: AI content creation proved more cost-effective compared to human content. The speed and efficiency of AI tools mean lower operational costs.
  • Time: AI significantly reduced the time required for content creation, offering rapid draft preparation. However, human content, while time-consuming, often required less editing and refinement.
  • Scalability: AI content is scalable, capable of generating large volumes of content quickly. Human content creation, by contrast, is limited by individual productivity and resources.
  • Quality: In terms of quality, human content maintained the upper hand, particularly in engaging and resonating with the audience.
  • Trust: Human-authored content was perceived as more trustworthy, likely due to its authenticity and emotional resonance. AI content, though improving, still faces challenges in building similar levels of trust.

The bottom line: AI’s great for speed and scale, but when you want creativity, quality, and a real human touch, nothing beats human content.

The Verdict

As of now, if you’re choosing between AI vs. human content, our study suggests sticking with humans.

Why? Because humans bring creativity, emotional depth, and a personal touch that AI just hasn’t mastered yet. Sure, AI is fast and cost-effective, but when it comes to quality and trust, humans still have the edge.

Human Content Vs. Hybrid Content Graph Shows That Human Content Ranks Higher Than Hybrid

And remember, Google’s guidelines are always evolving. What works today in SEO might change tomorrow, and keeping up with these changes is something humans are adept at.

So, for content that resonates and engages, human is the way to go – at least for now.

The Future of AI-Based Content Creation

Our investigation hinged on ChatGPT-3.5, but the horizon is already expanding with new advancements.

ChatGPT-4 and Beyond

Graphic Compares The Capabilities Of Chatgpt-3 Vs. Chatgpt-4

Image Source: The Cymes

The introduction of ChatGPT-4 marks a significant leap. This latest version promises to bring improved understanding and a more refined creative flair. Its potential to mimic human-like nuances in content is expected to further enhance the quality of AI-generated content.

Mastering the Magic Wand

As we move forward, the key is not just in using AI tools, but in mastering them. It’s about strategically wielding these advanced tools to augment human creativity, not replace it. The goal is to strike a balance that leverages the best of both worlds.

Integrating with AI Image & Video Generators

Imagine the synergy of combining ChatGPT-4’s advanced text generation with AI-driven image and video creators. This could create a rich, multi-dimensional content experience, blending the written word with compelling visuals, all fine-tuned by human insight to ensure relevance and authenticity.

AI vs. Human Content: What Lies Ahead

Wrapping up, our deep dive into AI versus human content has been enlightening. We embarked on this journey with ChatGPT-3.5, curious about how AI stacks up against human creativity. Now, we’re looking towards a future where tools like ChatGPT-4 promise even greater capabilities.

The key takeaway? Human content still reigns supreme in engaging and resonating with audiences. Yet, as AI evolves and Google’s guidelines change, we anticipate a landscape where AI and human creativity collaborate more seamlessly.

The future of content creation is an exciting blend of human ingenuity and AI efficiency, a frontier we at Marketing Insider Group are eager to explore and lead.

Ready to master the balance between AI vs. human content? Check out our SEO Blog Writing Service or schedule a quick consultation to learn more about how Marketing Insider Group can help you earn more leads for your business.

By: Michael Brenner
Title: AI vs. Human Content: What Actually Gets You Results? [Research Report]
Sourced From:
Published Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 11:00:07 +0000

This content is being shared by Brand Velocity. We are dedicated to assisting you to craft a successful internet-based brand and influence Google for your personal brand. We support entrepreneurs gain new target markets, develop a competitive advantage, or save time and generate more leads.
The Brand Velocity Program may assist you propel your personal brand’s growth and success that may build authority and trust with both Google and potential customers.